A Discussion on Term Limits - Bath, NY - The Courier

A Discussion on Term Limits

Print Comment
By Halen Allison

In the early 1990s, term limits for Congress was a hot topic at the state level with many states voting to limit the terms of their congressional representatives.  A constitutional amendment was even proposed by certain lawmakers.  These efforts were defeated respectively by a Supreme Court decision in 1995 and congressional apathy.  Today we don’t hear much about term limits and we’ve come to accept the possibility of virtual life terms for our Representatives and Senators.  I think that it’s time the issue was brought up once again. 

Since 1964, the reelection rate for the House of Representatives has never dipped below 85%.  The Senate hasn’t enjoyed quite as high numbers, but has only dipped lower than 70% in three elections since that year.  At first glance, one might think that these high reelection rates are indicative of a happy electorate.  But when the approval rating for Congress is in the low teens, this reasoning must be questioned, especially when voters affiliated with both parties seem to agree that Congress does a terrible job. 

There are many reasons incumbents enjoy such high reelection rates, and the sum of these reasons make it difficult if not impossible for challengers to defeat them, essentially guaranteeing long careers for what have become career politicians.  Incumbents have name recognition, organized infrastructure in their home districts and in Washington, ready access to donors, the backing of one of the two major parties, and no challenges from within their own party.  They’ve already won at least one election, and we should never discount the effects of district realignment resulting in favorable demographics (i.e. solid party voters).  Voters aren’t necessarily happy with their representative; the deck is just greatly stacked against challengers.  Term limits solve these problems. 

Collectively, we recognize the poor job Congress does, yet we keep sending the same men and women to represent us.  This isn’t a good thing.  Poor turnover ossifies the legislature, and limits the opportunities for otherwise quality and qualified citizens to represent their communities.  Further, the success of term limits in local and state politics is proof that term limits are not bad and may in fact infuse legislative bodies with new life. 

So I ask our leaders and fellow citizens:  Term limits; why not?

Loading commenting interface...

About this blog

>
The Steuben Courier Town Square offers an opportunity to get the conversation rolling! Our bloggers, Halen Allison and Ed Spencer will offer their ideas on issues in the area and beyond. It's sure to spark a healthy debate.

Contributors

Recent Posts


Site Services
Obituaries
Place an Ad
Subscribe
Online Forms
Archives
Market Place
Classifieds
Find Bath jobs
Real Estate
Shopping
Coupons
Radar Frog
Communities
Avoca
Bath
Campbell
Hammondsport
Prattsburgh
Savona
Lifestyle
Food
Celebrations
Entertainment